- 01
Complete source views
Front, back and construction details give review enough evidence to protect the product.
- 02
Catalogue-led outputs
Consistent model, pose and background plans make the transformation easy to evaluate.
- 03
Collection-scale direction
Related garments can share a cast and visual recipe while keeping product records separate.
Preserve the form.
Add the person.
Use an on-mannequin or clean ghost-mannequin as structured evidence, then add casting and direction without treating the garment as an invention.
SHAPE-LED SOURCE · COLLECTION CASTING · SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWSource evidence complete
Map what the source proves.
Flag what it does not.
Ghost mannequin or on-mannequin production starts with evidence, not inference. Confirm the visible silhouette and construction, then request the view needed to resolve anything hidden.
Choose the cast once.
Give every view a job.
The model and view plan are chosen around the garment evidence. Front, angle and back each prove something different about the product.
Review the form.
Not just the finished image.
The output is judged against the product record attribute by attribute. A polished frame does not pass when the garment shape, neckline, construction or color has drifted.
Know when the source is enough.
Know when to ask for more.
Ghost mannequin is strongest when the product record is clean and complete. Missing evidence should become an exception for the team, not a creative guess.
- 01
Hidden construction
If a seam, opening or back treatment is absent from the source, request it instead of inventing it.
- 02
Unclear volume
Soft drape and layered garments may need additional angles or on-form references before approval.
- 03
Material ambiguity
Reflective, transparent or highly textured fabrics need closer source evidence and stricter review.